JOIN US: This is a chat-based conversation about advancements in next-generation health-care IT, including new collaboration tools, AI and telemedicine.
This has been a very informative discussion. Outstanding interaction and engagement. eWEEK thanks each of you who brought a perspective, opinion or data point to our community round table today.
I am excited to see like minded folks working hard on problems that are important. There is so much to do in healthcare analytics, that having bright minds and $$ spent solving these problems with data is really quite exciting - being selfish here for my kids
Understand what risks you are trying to mitigate, develop a plan on how IT can best get you the reportable data around those risks. Once you have the data, don't just let it lie; use it to make better decisions.
two key from me from this fun discussion today: (1) data and interop is so critical to healthcare -- collecting, connecting, and analyzing data in a HIPAA safe manner; (2) how do we ensure the innovations we create keep patients at the center of experience
[Sidebar note: A very cool feature of CrowdChat, BTW, is that you can save this conversation link and all the brainpower that went into it. Also a great way to know who knows what on this topic for reference.]
A6: Stopping viruses or their mutation won't be easy but certainly responding to any such outbreak and containing it can be facilitated with tech like Digital epidemiological surveillance and rapid case identification
A6: Also hoping this pandemic pushes rapid population level vaccine deployment and population level home testing (or even water effluent testing programs)
With mutations - being quickly track and trace the spread of a mutation and map the vaccine that will be most effective against the variant and then deploy it before the variant becomes the dominant strain (like we do with the flu)
The gathering of data is only the start; what do you do with the data next? Metrics, actionable reporting and the like will translate the data into useful information.
@saagrawa It would be ideal if we could share data like this, but the problem is there are issues with sharing data (geopolitical, HIPAA regulations, GDPR, etc.) that prevents a lot of sharing data.
A5: Personally I think we will settle into a hybrid world where some demand will be shunted to Telemedicine but it's hard to replace for example some Oncology appointments in person
A5: However second opinions, skin conditions, other less "I need to see / touch, examine the patient" conditions can move far more effectively online. Maybe with imaging that can be read online we could do even more.
Q5: Sadly, I think telemedicine is starting to put the onus of diagnosis on the patient. In other industries, such as food, being able to customize your order the way you want can be beneficial. Requiring the patients to do more is problematic.
A5: I've been thinking a lot recently with telehealth in the context of health maintenance. as remote monitoring tools (like CGMs, etc) continue to get better, appts with diabetic educators, A1c checkins, etc will get even more valuable as a remote capability
@saagrawa A5: I agree some exciting innovations are coming, but I think it might actually degrade our level of healthcare. I could be wrong, as perhaps medical professionals could maybe focus on higher level tasks than before.
A5: I think one major innovation that will happen in remote healthcare (broader context than just telehealth) will be as continuous glucose monitors become the standard instead of finger pricks. once we solve the mountain of data they generate, it'll be a huge step
A4 LOL this reminds of me of the XKCD comic: there are 15 competing standards. we need one universal standard! ... how there are 16 competing standards.
A4: Good question Chris! The first question IT needs to ask with what problem am I trying to solve? You need to know what risk that you're trying to address first. Developing or purchasing software without a clear path creates more problems than it solves.
A4: also hopeful that walled gardens will be less so - reading and writing to multiple systems with a common framework would make life so much easier for everyone for sure. Seems like a "tooth fairy" like concept at this point though
A4: Once you know what risk you're addressing, then you can target what data you actually need from the system. The best way is to start with actionable metrics, such as the amount of vulnerabilities remediated within 30 days, over a span of a year.
A4 I really want to believe that FHIR is going to be as close as we get to one solution for the universe, but having now implemented 80+ EHRs @lumahealthhq and implementing all the major EHR's FHIR implementations ...
Then, you can develop or acquire the system that best suits your reporting needs. Having a clear project management path normally helps problems of purchasing systems that don't interoperate, and ending up with a bigger problem then you started with.
A4 ... we end up having a distinct FHIR implementation per EHR. And on top of that, there are ~3 versions of FHIR in the wild. so i'd say it's "better" than where we were 5 years ago but it's not great by any means in terms of getting access to clean or real time data.
@LeanTaaS we enable hospitals to do more with less - see more patients at lower cost with less wait by improving the utilization of their existing assets
We do this by matching supply and demand of these assets (both of which are stochastic by nature) in a much more mathematically precise way than EHRs can
thanks @editingwhiz! we @lumahealthhq provide a full EHR-integrated platform to help engage, communicate, guide, and retain patients at all points of their care journey. needing care is hard, getting access to care shouldn't be.
Schellman offers a wide range of compliance audits and assessments, such as HITRUST, HIPAA assessments, SOC 1 & 2, ISO (many varieties), CMMC and the like. If you need IT Compliance, we most likely have what you're looking for!
