SecurityDisconnect

Impact of security disconnect
A discussion of the impact a disconnect between IT and the wider business has on security
Joe Baguley
Security is clearly a priority but worryingly IT teams are not disclosing details of some serious cyber attacks in their organisation.
Joe Baguley
Are they hiding to save their jobs?
Joe Baguley
Is this a cultural problem?
Sarah Richmond
Will this change with the upcoming GDPR in that organisations will have to declare data breaches?
Charles Barratt
It's certainly an issue, however new EU laws announced now compel companies to report cyberattacks where data has been breached...so hopefully it will improve http://www.zdnet.com...
Trustmarque
GDPR will certainly increase dilligence around security. Even for UK, if/when we leave the EU - here's why: http://bit.ly/290ryS...
Matthew Northam
It compels the companies but to Joe's point will the "whistleblowers"/IT teams be punished for reporting it? I hope not as I hope it brings a change in culture to being more proactive around security and data....hope springs
Rory Choudhuri
Culturally, EMEA folks are disinclined to be open about errors and failures – perhaps because of management attitudes?
Gregg Robertson
@roarers Having just completed work for an international bank recently, personnel being open about security and breaches can bring legal proceedings against them due to bankers oaths being signed
Rory Choudhuri
@GreggRobertson5 Which leads us to the point where the only solution is legislation :-/
Jeremy van Doorn
As we come to the close of this Crowdchat, a big thank you to all of you for joining the conversation! I think we'd all agree that security HAS to be higher on the C-level agenda. So I'll leave you with this image... http://www.via-cc.at...

Charles Barratt
Brilliant discussion! Thank you to everyone who has joined
Joe Baguley
What should be the new approach to security if there is one? Should we start building it into the core? http://www.via-cc.at...

Jeremy van Doorn
Yes! Security should be part of the design from the start, rather than bolted on afterwards!
Gregg Robertson
Too many times security and compliance is only an after thought once the solutions are built which can cause severe delays and even projects being shelved
Charles Barratt
absolutely! security needs to be part of the foundations within the IT infrastructure and not an afterthought
Rik Ferguson REMAIN
You got mine, explode your infosec department, have a champion in every line of business or department.
Jeremy van Doorn
Building security into the core platform everywhere also allows for much faster go to market, as fewer things have to be altered when moving from dev to testing to production!
Dor Zakai
YES!! Part of every step we take and in every implementation we do
Rik Ferguson REMAIN
To be honest, data centre and desktop virtualisation gives you a great opportunity to "Rip It Up and Start Again"
Gregg Robertson
@rik_ferguson Also with the CDCI of cloud, security baselines of products can be torn down and spun up within minutes.
Jeremy van Doorn
Now that many companies are using Desktop Virtualization, does that increase the need for segmentation in the Datacenter. End Users are now located sooooooo close to the crown jewels in the datacenter.
Joe Baguley
SDDC also gives you opportunities to do things in new ways you didn't think of before...
Rik Ferguson REMAIN
So, hey, let's talk about the disconnect, it's a pet subject of mine and I'd love to hear how others feel about it. Does security "fit" with the rest of your business?
Rik Ferguson REMAIN
Does your business "fit" with security? Are you still a roadblock? Or perceived as one?
Francis Dropik
there is definitely still the perception of being a roadblock. 16% of employees in the UK would risk breaching their organisation’s security to carry out their job more effectively...
Joe Baguley
We are not seeing enough alignment between business leaders and IT decision makers over security planning and priorities
Rik Ferguson REMAIN
So here's my thing, I think that we are fundamentally doing security wrong and I'll explain why. I believe our goals should be to see the InfoSec department all but disappear, that's the ideal state 1/x
Rik Ferguson REMAIN
We always complain that security is "bolted-on" to products, processes and systems, that it is not designed in from the ground up or fully integrated. Yet we continue to bolt security on from a business function perspective 2/x
Rik Ferguson REMAIN
The ideal state is for a distributed and integrated security function, with campions in each line of business or department. They understand the business drivers for that department and the security concerns. 3/x
Francis Dropik
And then there is the lack of education and guidance coming from the business leaders and IT out the wider organisation. What can be done to tackle the 'human error' element?
Rik Ferguson REMAIN
and they are better able to make sure systems and processes of business are conceptualised securely from the off.
Rik Ferguson REMAIN
It's too long for Twitter I guess, but that's the gist 5/5
Rik Ferguson REMAIN
@FranDropik Of course there is trading and there is policy, trading to ensure the policy is understood and adhered to. What is often missing though is an ability to *enforce* policy.
Joe Baguley
So, security should be something that people don't have to think about and is inherent in the system?
Rik Ferguson REMAIN
Secure by design is the nirvana I guess (not the Kurt Nirvana), we need to recognise we'll probably not get there, but we need to keep trying. We need also to recognise that vulnerabilities exist simply in "the way we do things", not just in tech.
Phares Kariuki
good security needs to be invisible, at the end of the day
Jeremy van Doorn
I wanted to start with the statement that security spend is on the rise yet so is the cost of breaches…with data becoming more valuable, it also becomes more vulnerable http://www.via-cc.at...

Jeremy van Doorn
Our study found that organisations are under threat of serious cyber attacks – 37% of EMEA ITDMs think one will happen in the next 90 days
Rory Choudhuri
Any comments on the speed of reporting and disclosure?
Trustmarque
It's no wonder people fear attacks - high-profile breaches are in the news every day #securitydisconnect
Francis Dropik
We found similar data in the UK - 24% of businesses expected an attack, yet only 5% of corporate leaders deemed security a priority. Massive disconnect.
Rik Ferguson REMAIN
@roarers You can expect that to ramp up over the next couple of years as GDPR kicks in.
Jeremy van Doorn
Yes, the fear is certainly there. However, many business leaders still underestimate just how big of a target they are.
Cherry Gray
Interesting reporting from NCA on cyber arms race today and the UK is not keeping up http://www.bbc.co.uk...
Rik Ferguson REMAIN
@CherryGiles don't forget that is a department fighting for budget and attention (deservedly) in an increasingly cash-strapped administration.
Matthew Northam
@rik_ferguson Do you think organisation outside of the EU but that will be impacted by the Regulation are prepared? or even aware?
Rik Ferguson REMAIN
In large part no, wee just completed a survey on that, there is also a lot of post referendum confusion. Fact is, it will still apply in most cases.
Jeremy van Doorn
They will definitely be impacted as the GDPR regulation aims at any organisation storing data about EU Citizens. So, many companies outside of of the EU will also be impacted by this.
Rik Ferguson REMAIN
storing data or selling services to EU nations
Jeremy van Doorn
Matt, do you think companies outside of the EU are aware of the GDPR and taking appropriate action?
Jeremy van Doorn
I think all of this points to the need to bring security back to the top of the boardroom agenda – and that’s what we want to discuss today
Matthew Northam
I dont.....asking around they think it is an EU problem. When explained that if they hold data on me they are impacted I get funny looks, data is global!
Rik Ferguson REMAIN
Yep. My experience tallies with this too, very little US awareness.