oow15

complexities in the enterprise environment is about the amount of data and security; everything else is subordinate

All that data represents opportunity... and a risk
@bkrunner f/ @Intel f/ #OOW

the enterprise is entering the platform wars; Oracle, AWS, Microsoft, Google, Dell/EMC and IBM

With innovation comes huge opportunity.
@bkrunner f/ @Intel f/ #OOW

@furrier interesting to hear CEO Intel talking data center generically #OOW15

Come on lets get Ellison on - Intel announce something please

@dahowlett this is mind blowing -zzzzzzzz

Intel has to introduce more "Cores" it's their std keynote move

Intel's bet in the cloud was huge a few years ago. #IoT will be huge for them #theCUBE

Intel investing in ecosystem that will be focused on Software defined set of chips

Intel Cloud for All - does that compete with Oracle ??

Announcing project Apollo intel technology from Intel to optimize Oracle cloud

What exactly is project Apollo? Intel Cloud for All? Im confused. How does this align with Oracle? What time is Larry on?

. @Phil_Dunn1 They are getting the "filler" signal - Larry is redlining the slides behind stage

Oh cool, Mark has brought out the first piñata -happens to be blue ;-)

. @Phil_Dunn1 More Cores; Higher Core Frequency - More Cache – More Cache per Core – More Memory Bandwidth More IO Bandwidth - More PCIe Lanes

Wow-Mark states over 1,000 customers have migrated from IBM Power to Exa

. @Phil_Dunn1 I see Power8 as competition to Oracle

. @Phil_Dunn1 Power from IBM has traction in the OpenPower movement - your move Oracle

Andrew Ruggiero ‏@Ruggdoctor said
@furrier A centralized security approach I think will be key to any one of their successes, a single policy that works on prem and on cloud

Yes of course. Oracle has a two glove approach to take out Power. Intel in Exa based Engineered Systems, SPARC M7 for Unix/Secure based requirements.

cloud_opinion says @cloud_opinion says
Someone at Intel marketing screaming: Oh shit, we gave our CEO a presentation from 2005 by mistake.

@furrier I think IBM has commoditized Power by OpenPower. So far, few products based on OpenPower, underwhelming sales, little traction, poor value proposition over Intel/Oracle.

. @dahowlett Dennis Howlett says
Folk asking why Intel is getting such a Big Up here have completely missed what this is about

ExaPower is a direct strike at IBM #oPower

I have a feeling Larry might side stage the opening act.

@Phil_Dunn1 Unix is back in the saddle again

R Ray Wang (王瑞光) ‏@rwang0 said
MyPOV: as software moves into the chip, expect greater speed, efficiency, and reliability

@furrier Just found the Exa Your Power program info. https://www.oracle.c...

@furrier I think you've just figured out what Larry will be presenting afterwards. ;-)

Larry better go after AWS if he doesn't then Oracle is being disrupted by them .. he has to punch back

Oh no worries there. AWS might be really strong in public cloud for dev/ops, but the enterprise has different challenges/requirements and Oracle has a less complex, better solution to move them to the cloud, private or public.

Dennis Howlett @dahowlett says
@furrier: I'd prefer to see LJE punch to ORCL strengths rather than poke at AWS.

I'm sure there will be both

@Phil_Dunn1 Generally "DevOps" is just a way of dev working with ops to meet biz goals, so as relevant to enterprise as elsewhere. Same challenges. Same requirements.

@rjhintz So when you do dev/ops, you normally run on specific HW right (servers/storage/networking/etc)? What happens when you then go into production and HW isn't identical? That’s the Oracle advantage. Same exact products on-premise or in the cloud.

@Phil_Dunn1 Devops techniques don't assume uniform or diverse HW or SW. Usually the HW is abstracted.

@Phil_Dunn1 For the case you cite, dev codes to a higher, abstracted layer that's the same as ops has spun up for prod

@rjhintz But if you're expecting to run on an engineered system for realtime analytics performance, dev/ops support in public cloud clearly won't be the same-unless its Oracle cloud

@Phil_Dunn1 Several different things here. 1) Real time analytics are avail with Spark or Storm. 2) Why would a generic dev "[expect] to run on an engineered system? 3) "dev/ops support in public cloud" <=Don't understand point 3

@furrier Disagree. Service resilience is most important. No service, then no access to data and security is moot.

@rjhintz great point Rich no service no security issue ..

@furrier this is true for systems of record and systems of differentiation. Systems of innovation, need more agility, you know; the ones we call fail-fast, fail-cheap, fail-often ones.

We provide the full stack of hardware & software to support companies. Our customers have compatibility between what they run in their data center & what they run in our data center. Edward Screven on #theCUBE

I don't think security implies lack of agility. Building security into the stack makes it much easier to do dev/ops. Edward Screven on #theCUBE

Oracle cannot access your data keys or decrypt the data customers store on the Oracle cloud. Edward Screven on #theCUBE

Multi-tenant is not secure. Customers have done multitenant by striping data by subscriber ID and checking constantly against cross-overs. That is fundamentally less secure than single-tenant. Edward Screven on #theCUBE

When you use Oracle cloud, Oracle SaaS, Oracle applications, you get security built-in, you don't have a choice. That is more secure & agile. Edward Screven on #theCUBE

You are guaranteed that the code going through your dedicated switch is all your code, that the code running on your dedicated processor is all your code. Edward Screven on #theCUBE

It's a QOS and resource availability issue. Edward Screven on #theCUBE

Integration between platform, infrastructure & SaaS applications & the compatibility All the knowledge you have in how to run Oracle applications transfers to the Oracle cloud. Edward Screven on #theCUBE

Our customers have thousands of applications they built themselves. So leveraging the new technologies doesn't mean you have to forget everything you know and hire new people. Edward Screven on #theCUBE

We never wanted to build a proprietary stack. We don't build evertying. Other vendors will build value-added components we will want to add to our stack. Edward Screven on #theCUBE

We follow open standards because it guides us to sustained innovation. Edward Screven on #theCUBE

The application market has two segments. One is SaaS. We supply all the SaaS you want. Along side that will be an endless array of new apps that need to integrate into those older apps. Edward Screven on #theCUBE

Because our SaaS apps are tied to our stack we enable all those new interesting applications can run in our cloud. Edward Screven on #theCUBE

If you buy SaaS applications from different vendors you recreate a fragmented environment. By providing the full set of core SaaS applications we provide full integration. Edward Screven on #theCUBE

We realized you can't just take an on-prem app and move it to the cloud. It hs to be implemented in a modern programming language (Java). It had to be extendable. It has to be on a platform that allows those extensions to run in the cloud. Edward Screven

We support a broad set of technologies in our platform . They can integrate with our SaaS applications. That includes apps written in Python and other languages. Edward Screven on #theCUBE