Mark Peters59
Q.6) So if a user is now getting interested - what are the top challenges customers face when implementing software-defined storage?
Eric Herzog
ONe is making sure you have DP and DR covered. Many SDS products don't have that. IBM does
Eric Carter
servers! storage folks are sometimes not attuned to buying servers - a bit foreign sometimes
Eric Herzog
Full coverage from scaling to performance to protection to DR
Mark Peters
What about organizational issues? Is everyone "ready" for this?
Chris Algozzine
first challenge is knowing where to start .. second is knowing what workloads to leverage this new approach
Eric Stouffer
I suspect fear of something different is a challenge..."we've always done it this way" can slow down or inhibit new approachs
Chris Algozzine
the funny thing is, they don't need to be "ready" they already HAVE it and don't know it...
Steve Wojtowecz
SDS is flexible by nature and often iterative in practice. Some of the common challenges that I hear from clients for SDS varies from data protection to managing complex workloads and more. No one SDS product offering provides all capabilities
Mark Peters
Titally agree Eric - there's alwasy uncertainty
Eric Herzog
Yes, they are ready for this. Storage is a huge pain. SDS doesn't eliminate that pain but makes is MUCH less intense
Chris Algozzine
products like IBM Storwize have been "software defined" for years ... products like IBM Spectrum Scale are delivered as appliances with our partners and they too are "software defined"
Chris Saul
The idea that server and storage purchases become essentially the same thing will be a challenge for some and an opportunity for others
Eric Herzog
Anyone who thinks storage is "easy" doesn't understand it. But with SDS storage gets way easier than it is today
Steve Wojtowecz
SDS products intelligently manage differing workload types by placing data on optimal storage types and tiers.
Mark Peters
Yup, I think there's pressure to find a better way....and, as was said much earlier, storage has been subject to s/w management for ever (just differently placed and less easy to use!)
Ron Riffe
Back in the day, DBA's were worried about RAID because they liked to know where on the platter their database was laid out. Seems there will be some who are nervous with a SDS paradigm. But cloud may be breaking down the old walls.
Eric Herzog
Correct. In short, right storage for the righr workload and SDS makes is much easie to do that
Tom Saville
@zoginstor I will reuse that sentence
Chris Saul
@RonRiffe Good analogy!
Rob Whiteley
Data migration. It's what any new storage solution faces, but for some reason the anxiety is higher in SDS. Probably because of the lack of awareness and "trust factor."
Chris Algozzine
the real challenge is the willingness to embrace the next transformational technology shift in data storage and data management - SDS is that next wave - clients who embrace it now will be positioned to compete better in the future
Mark Peters
Yes Rob - anything new tends to lead people to look for issues before opportunities - I think it's the human condition!
Chris Saul
As @calgoIBM said, anxiety should be less because many (most?) are already doing some SDS. They just don't know it and perhaps that's the big challenge of defining SDS
Eric Herzog
True but storage is so darn hard people should be running to SDS.
Eric Herzog
Doesn't solve world hunger but does make it way, way easier to do storage
Eric Herzog
Some workloads customers will still want dedicated HW and nothing wrong with that
Eric Herzog
SDS just gives you a level of flexibility of deployment that has not existing in storgae
Chris Saul
And a good SDS solution will embrace that traditional hardware, no leave it out in the cold
Chris Algozzine
@zoginstor so, you're saying they can have it their way?
Eric Herzog
Yes you can have it their way